Comparison of Bernie Sanders' and Investors' Business Daily Arguments About Free Healthcare

For this assignment I would like you to read the following two pieces arguing for and against free healthcare for all Americans and, then, answer the questions.

"Why We Need Medicare for All" - Bernie Sanders' 2017 New York Times opinion-editorial Links to an external site.

Investors' Business Daily 2018 Editorial: "'Medicare For All' Would Cost $32.6 Trillion, And That's Not Even The Worst Of It" Links to an external site.

Please answer the following questions below about these two pieces

Note 1: No specific word count is required. However, your post will be worth ten points.  

Note 2: For some of these prompts below, you may want to think about the different audiences for the Sanders' piece and the Investors' Business Daily, a liberal New York Times audience and more conservative business-minded audience. 

Remember, you can refer to these two documents for information about different rhetorical appeals and strategies, Overview of Rhetoric and Rhetorical Analysis,  Download Overview of Rhetoric and Rhetorical Analysis,  Rhetorical Analysis The Basics Download Rhetorical Analysis The Basics

1.Identify a Rhetorical Strategy Download a Rhetorical Strategy used in the Investors' Business Daily editorial and provide an example quote to show how it is used.

2. Identify a Rhetorical Strategy Download a Rhetorical Strategy used in the Sanders' opinion-editorial and provide an example quote to show how it is used. 

3. Identify one type of appeal (ethos, pathos or logos) that you see most often used in the Sanders' piece. Why do you think Sanders uses this appeal the most?

4. Identify one type of appeal (ethos, pathos or logos) that you see most often used in the Investors' Business Daily piece. Why do you think Investors' Business Daily uses this appeal the most?

5. Briefly explain which editorial seemed more effective to you and why, the Sanders or the Investors' Business Daily?